  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		peter.rees01(at)tiscali.c Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 12:37 pm    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I know that this may descend into the mono vs tri-gear, 912s vs 914 
 arguements but I'll ask the question anyway:
 
 G-MFHI is fitted with a 912 fitted with a coursly set (18 degrees) 
 warpdrive - This returns a respectable 118-120kts and a rate of climb that 
 doesn't cause concern over the trees at Rochester.
 
 The course setting of the prop limits the engine RPM to about 5100 so we 
 can't legally use the weight upgrade.
 
 If we were to fit a VP/CS prop, we would see the requsite increase in RPM 
 and could therefore use the 1370 limit.
 
 My question is - would a change to (what looks like) a prop with a more 
 spohisticated blade design such as the  Kremen give me any advantage in the 
 cruise? If so, does anyone have any comments (positive or negative) which 
 prop (Rospellor, Kremen etc)  may be more suitable to fitting to a Classic 
 912 - which is about to have the engine removed for sprag clutch replacement 
  (
 
 Peter
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		terrys(at)cisco.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:15 pm    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				We flew over 100 hours with a Whirlwind 2-blade prop which looked much 'heftier' than the Warp Drive/Airmaster props.  We later-on converted over to the Airmaster prop with Warp Drive blades.  We were able to measure no difference in climb or cruise performance, but did see an increase in braking effect with the throttle closed, with the Warp Drive producing greater drag.
 
 Just a random comment, for what it is worth.
 
 Terry Seaver
 A135/N135TD
 Mono-wheel XS with 912S
 
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		bryan(at)blackballclub.co Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:29 pm    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Peter,
 
 I do not know the Rospellor prop, and can make no comparisons.
 
 I have converted my XS to Kremin CS. This enables more efficient, smoother 
 performance in cruise, but does not seem to seriously improve take off 
 performance. You should note that the extra weight involves will seriously 
 detract from useful payload, possibly by as much as 20 pounds.
 
 The consensus is that the conversion is worthwhile with the 80 horse 912 on 
 short fields. The 100 horse 912S makes the conversion les relevant, 
 particularly when using longer strips.
 
 You will get plenty of conflicting advice on this I am sure, but my personal 
 opinion is that the fixed pitch did not come a poor second place. I would 
 not convert back now that I have spent my money (2300), but perhaps I could 
 have installed autopilot, or something else to more advantage with the 
 money.
 
 Cheers!  Bryan. G-BYSA XS Mono.
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		rholder(at)avnet.co.uk Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:48 pm    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		   The course setting of the prop limits the engine RPM to
  about 5100 so we can't legally use the weight upgrade.
  
  If we were to fit a VP/CS prop, we would see the
  requsite increase in RPM and could therefore use the
  1370 limit.
  
  My question is - would a change to (what looks like) a
  prop with a more spohisticated blade design such as the
  Kremen give me any advantage in the cruise? If so, does
  anyone have any comments (positive or negative) which 
  prop (Rospellor, Kremen etc)  may be more suitable to
  fitting to a Classic 912 - which is about to have the
  engine removed for sprag clutch replacement  (
 
 | 	  
 
 You will end up with the catch 22 position. The extended
 baggage bay which increases the MTOW by 70 pounds to 1370
 itself weighs at least 20 pounds !
 
 The upgrade from Warp Drive to Airmaster with WarpDrive
 adds another 10 or 15 pounds - I don't have the actual
 figure in front of me.
 
 So the extra expense and effort will only increase your
 carrying capacity by 35 pounds !
 
 Two steps forward and one step back. Net progress one step
 at about 2500 !
 
 Richard
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		lmorgan822(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:43 pm    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Look for Vari-Prop at space 26, Sun'n'Fun.  You will be pleasantly surprised!!!!!!!!!!! 
  
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		william(at)wrmills.plus.c Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:18 am    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Peter,
 If you are considering a Kremen / Woodcomp CS prop, they are currently 
 developing a new blade with more twist, designed to suit higher cruise 
 speeds like the Europa.  It may be worthwhile to wait a few months for the 
 new product to be released.
 Best wishes,
 William
 
 Do not archive
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		ami(at)mcfadyean.freeserv Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:41 am    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The Aerosail prop at
 http://www.aero-sail.com/aero-sail/offer.xml/propellers/air
 claims to be aero-elastic.
 Whether it is to the extent that it would give sufficient increase in 
 take-off revs for an 80hp Europa, I can't answer; In any case, blade shape 
 usually needs to be far more scimitar-like to have a useful amount of pitch 
 change on loading.
 There is an example  installed on an AT-3 in the UK (based at North Weald); 
 there's a fly-in there on 22 April (could be the last fly-in there ahead of 
 2000 houses).
 
 This is what the owner reported after changing from a 2-blade fixed pitch:
 
 "In any case, the figures for the AT-3 are quite impressive.  The take-off
 run reduced from over 200 metres to 145 metres, while the cruise speed
 increases by up to 5 knots for the same RPM setting.  Rate of climb is also
 significantly better than with the 2-blade propeller".
 
 PFA approvals for use of this prop are currently on 912 and 912S engines, 
 but none specifically on an Europa at the moment.
 I've no further info. short of going to look at the prop; which is intended 
 on 22 April.
 
 Duncan Mcf.
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		lmorgan822(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:28 pm    Post subject: Which Prop | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Look for Vari-Prop at Sun'n'fun space 26.  Blades custom made for your application, lightweight, CS, and tough enough for direct drive engines. 
  
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |