 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:02 pm Post subject: Help needed: continued strobe noise & |
|
|
At 06:37 AM 7/17/2006 -0400, you wrote:
Quote: |
In a message dated 7/16/06 8:11:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
luckymacy(at)comcast.net writes:
> Lucky: I used Van's pre-made wiring kit but I don't recall if the wiring
to
> the strobes was shielded or not.
======================================
Lucky:
I think you found the problem. I say that because of the above statement
about the pre-made harness. If they are running the strobe's wires right
along
side the wires for your other lights AND if they are not shielded then it
would
be very easy for the other wires to pick up the noise from the strobes.
Try running a separate SHIELDED pair of wires and ground the shield ONLY at
the strobe. The shielded pair should have three wires ... B+. Neg and
SHIELD.
The Neg is grounded at both ends, while the shield is only at the strobe. I
would still use the filter, just for S&Gs. Run the strobe wires away from
the
other wires.
I have a similar strobe system as you with the power supplies. The strobes
mounted at the wing tips and tail; three power supplies. I found that
there is
a small amount of noise from the tail strobe. I know I can get rid of it
with an RS type filter, but it is on a GA aircraft so I'm not allowed to
use RS
or Lowe's aviation components
You did say you tried mounting the filter at each location, Strobe and Radio.
Another thing to check and I have not seen it mentioned is LEAD
LENGTH. You
must keep the leads as short as possible between the filter and the strobe.
Still another trick you may want to try is to install a ferrite bead
(tolroid) on the B+ lead, close to the strobe.
Me still being a bit redundant, make sure you have extra clean ground
connections; aluminum is not a good material for electrical connections.
Well, beyond all the techniques and trick I mentioned in this post and my
other. My other offer would be ... Where are you located, maybe we could
meet
up? I'd bet dollars to doughnuts I can solve your problem. I'd be glad
to help.
Barry
|
What is the nature of the noise? Whine from the power supply or
"popping" when the tubes fire? Have any noise isolation experiments
described in chapter 16 been conducted?
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:37 am Post subject: Help needed: continued strobe noise & |
|
|
Quote: | As for Inductive / capacitive coupling. We are talking DC circuits with
Noise in the AUDIO frequency range.
As the saying goes: K.I.S.S. M.E. All this stuff about capacitive and
inductive coupling is not an issue in a simple noise problem as we are
discussing here. AND what the heck is "NON-MAGNETIC BRAID-TYPE
SHIELDING"? Do you really expect people to go out looking for
"mu-metal"? ALL the braid used on any electrical circuit on our planes is
NONMAGNETIC ... It is made of COPPER WIRE. Copper is non magnetic the
last time I checked. Again K.I.S.S. M.E. is the word of the day.
Electronics is simple, it is really! All these boog-a-boo statements only
confuses the non-electrical types amongst us. The only thing they need to
know is how to remove the noise. Again that goes back to the basics of
noise, and breaking it down into DC and AC ... AC goes one step further
(Audio Frequencies [AF] and Radio Frequencies [RF]).
Basics:
AF Noise - Shield and Ground at the source [This is why the Mic & Phone
lines use insulating washers at the jacks and ground at the audio panel or
radios.]
RF Noise - Shield and Ground at both ends. [Here is where exceptions come
into play - Some times the grounding is done through a capacitor. BUT we
are dealing with AF Noise not RF so I'm not going to try to confuse people
out there.]
Let the manufacture of the wire worry about resistance of 1000 Ft and the
capacitive coupling / inductive coupling at AF & RF. The ONLY thing that
would be of interest to our noise plagued brevien is the Percentage of
Braid. You did not say anything about that! Yet again as long as you use
Mil-Spec wire the percentage of braid is acceptable and again our brevien
does not have to be concerned.
As for the Separation of wires .... I did address that with my very first
statement to Lucky; read above.
I would suggest that all the AF noise (strobe noise) we are discussing be
approached as I described AND then if the noise still exists just add
another ground t=at the other end of the shield. It is MUCH easier to ADD
a ground than to remove a ground.
|
The usefulness of shielding for wires is limited
and there are no fixed rules for grounding this end
or grounding that end. Further, shielding is a poor
substitute for internal filtering when radio frequencies
are involved.
Percentage of braid is an exceedingly tiny concern
and the use of "mil spec" wire is not a golden recipe
for success. If one has a noise problem the first
task is to properly identify the noise source and the
nature of the noise. The the game of Clue is played
to deduce the propagation mode. Fortunately with
strobe systems, millions have been installed in as
many vehicles with no noise issues. Similarly, thousands
of system with noise issues have been successfully
solved by application of very simple techniques . . .
techniques that almost never involve departure from the installation
instructions. If a noise problem is EVER mitigated by the
repositioning of wires, this is prima facie evidence of
a core problem wherein repositioning of wires only makes
the symptoms go away and does nothing to fix the real
issue. Similarly, if a system that has worked successfully
in many other installations suddenly seems to benefit from the
addition of wire shields, that too is only an aspirin on
the hurt that does not cure the infection.
In my whole career, I've never found it useful to add
shielding or to reposition equipment or its wiring as
a means for improving performance. If the original
poster of the problem can describe the results of any
experiments described in the 'Connection (or elsewhere)
to identify the propagation mode, then remedies are
readily at-hand to break that mode.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:02 am Post subject: Help needed: continued strobe noise & |
|
|
At 01:54 AM 7/16/2006 +0000, you wrote:
Quote: |
I have two "comm" issues that I haven't been able to debug to completion
yet. I'm using an Xcom 760 radio with their pre-made harness.
1) I still hear my strobes in my headset even when they are grounded with
the radio ground and even when I put power noise filters on. However, the
Radio Shack noise filters reference on Bob's web site were reported to me
to be no longer carried by them. So I used the only ones I could find
locally which were sold by Pep Boys and the capacitor was 4700 uF instead
of 2200 uF like Radio Shack apparently was.
|
Okay, I found the data I was looking for in my post of
a few minutes ago.
Quote: | More specifically, the strobe noise is relatively faint until I select the
Push to Talk button. Then it gets pretty loud. Some feedback going on
there. Looking for ideas from this list.
|
Have you tried operating strobes from a separate
battery? What is the nature of the noise you are hearing?
"POP" or "whine"?
Quote: | Should the capacitor specs have made a big difference on the effectiveness
overall of the noise filter? It made no measurable difference regardless
of whether I installed it just before the radio or out at the strobe's
power supply just before the AC +14v entered the power supply. I even
reversed direction of the filter and it didn't matter one iota. Really
bummed out about this turn of events since I thought they'd at least have
made some observable difference based upon stuff in the archives.
|
Your shooting in the dark. The task is to identify
the propagation mode and THEN go after the fix.
Quote: | 2) The second overall problem is that the radio still is reported to me
by other pilots as weak when I get much beyond a couple of miles and
breaks up in the pattern a lot. I'm guessing it's because I can't put out
enough consistent power to break their squelch consistently. When on the
actual ground taxiing around, if there's a crown or "hill" between me and
another airplane on the ground forget it. They can't hear me or vice a versa.
When I check my radio with a handheld on the ground I seem to be just fine
for the relatively close distances I've tried even when the plane is
inside an open hangar and come in just as loud on the hand held as anyone
else is. It also doesn't matter whether or not the strobes are powered on
or not as far as whether or not the range/strength improves. ie, even
with them off the lack of range doesn't improve.
I swapped the cable between the radio and the antenna and it made no
difference. I bought my antenna from Van's but didn't do any kind of
post install test besides checking it out with my comm radio and a hand
held and it seemed fine at the time...
Instead of using RG-58 I bought two pre-made RG-400 cables. What should
the center conductor's resistance read end to end? ~58 Ohms, right? My
actual reading bounces all over the place no matter how stable I am in
trying to read it. Strange. Also, there doesn't seem to be a short
between the center conductor and the plug itself when I check it with a
multimeter so I'm guessing the plugs were installed correctly.
Things I have left to try is just buy a pre-made 12' RG-58 cable from
radio shack and try it instead of the RG-400 cables. Also, I don't have a
spare comm antenna but I think RS carries a replacement 800 Mhz scanner
antenna with the right BNC connector that I can just temporarily use just
to see if makes any difference at all.
Any ideas from the list?
|
What you're suffering from is a huge lack of data. A wise
fellow once noted . . .
"I often say that when you can measure what
you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know
something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when
you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre
and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge,
but you have scarcely in your thoughts advanced to the state
of Science, whatever the matter may be. - Lord Kelvin"
Your cited symptoms suggest low output power output. Get a
wattmeter from a local two-way or avionics shop and MEASURE
your radio's power output as-installed in the airplane.
Measure it first with a dummy load . . . see:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Tools/Bird_43.jpg
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Tools/DummyLoad.jpg
then measure power output and MEASURE SWR with the antenna
connected.
Once you have the data from this exercise, we're then
in a position give you good advice.
I fully understand the difficulties of the task. One of
the hardest things to do is get somebody to load/rent
their tools. However, failing to apply the optimum tool
oft leads to hours of experiments that gather no
measurements that demonstrate movements toward or away
from success. Lord Kelvin had it down pat.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FLYaDIVE(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:01 am Post subject: Help needed: continued strobe noise & |
|
|
In a message dated 7/21/06 10:42:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
nuckollsr(at)cox.net writes:
Quote: | The usefulness of shielding for wires is limited
and there are no fixed rules for grounding this end
or grounding that end. Further, shielding is a poor
substitute for internal filtering when radio frequencies
are involved.
Percentage of braid is an exceedingly tiny concern
and the use of "mil spec" wire is not a golden recipe
for success. If one has a noise problem the first
task is to properly identify the noise source and the
nature of the noise. The the game of Clue is played
to deduce the propagation mode. Fortunately with
strobe systems, millions have been installed in as
many vehicles with no noise issues. Similarly, thousands
of system with noise issues have been successfully
solved by application of very simple techniques . . .
techniques that almost never involve departure from the installation
instructions. If a noise problem is EVER mitigated by the
repositioning of wires, this is prima facie evidence of
a core problem wherein repositioning of wires only makes
the symptoms go away and does nothing to fix the real
issue. Similarly, if a system that has worked successfully
in many other installations suddenly seems to benefit from the
addition of wire shields, that too is only an aspirin on
the hurt that does not cure the infection.
In my whole career, I've never found it useful to add
shielding or to reposition equipment or its wiring as
a means for improving performance. If the original
poster of the problem can describe the results of any
experiments described in the 'Connection (or elsewhere)
to identify the propagation mode, then remedies are
readily at-hand to break that mode.
Bob . . .
================================
|
Thank you Bob!
That is exactly what I said. As the saying goes you do not have to reinvent
the wheel.
Start with the basics and work from there. The original post by this fellow
contained information that he tried to obtain the Radio Shack noise filter ...
And I must say they surely do work. He did not have success getting it but
did obtain a second brand. He did not have any luck with that filter. What
should he do? Start with the basics and work from there.
I have found just the opposite from you ... I have done at least 4 planes
where repositioning the wires and/or running shielded wire have made a great
improvement, or totally eliminated the problem. Other things I do after the
basics are Filters, Tolroid Cores, Feed Through Capacitors, Capacitors to Ground
and Shorten wire leads. Sometimes one arrow does not kill the Sphinx. And I
still have not used all my arrows. One step at a time, starting with the basics
as you said... Good installation practices.
I have always said ... YELLED about improving GROUNDS and connections. Ya
gots ta start somewhere ... Starts wit da basics.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Actually I thought this issue was dead ... Well, at least the horse did not
move.
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eric M. Jones

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 565 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:57 am Post subject: Re: Help needed: continued strobe noise & |
|
|
I say ditto to Bob N's posting on this.
I would like to add that a recent EDN article says some relevant stuff (but mostly PCB related..but electrons don't know the difference). Worth a look:
http://www.edn.com/article/CA6335295.html
Hidden schematic---Ground is a good place to grow potatoes and carrots.
It is often asked "If my 1972 Cessna didn't need all this EMI stuff...why do I need it now?" We live in a world where voltages are going down, frequencies are going up and the average airplane has 100,000,000 X as many transistors as your Cessna did. Otis Elevator tests to make sure that passengers' cellphones don't plunge their computer-controlled elevators into the netherworld. Good design practices can help and ultimately great simplifications will make this design process smoother.
"philosopher" --n. A lunatic who can analyze his delusions.
- Ambrose Bierce
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Eric M. Jones
www.PerihelionDesign.com
113 Brentwood Drive
Southbridge, MA 01550
(508) 764-2072
emjones(at)charter.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|