  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		edpav8r(at)yahoo.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:12 am    Post subject: Flyback Diodes | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The following video was just posted by a fellow on YouTube who I follow.  It does a very nice job of illustrating the purpose and effect of using flyback or catch diodes on inductive loads like relay coils.
 Since the topic has arisen here a number of times, I thought this might be of interest.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6I7Ycbv8B8
 Eric
  [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:24 am    Post subject: Flyback Diodes | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				So, the diode we find jumpered between       the coil contacts on let's say, our starter relay, prevents a high       voltage shooting back thru our starter switch and arcing the       contacts when we let go of the starter key/switch?  
        
        Or does it prevent a power surge from hitting the entire       electrical system?
        
        Bill "waking up brain cells in disuse since early adolescence"       Watson
        (nice video, thanks!)
        
        On 11/17/2014 12:07 PM, Eric Page wrote:
      
      [quote]              
        The following video was just posted by a fellow on           YouTube who I follow.  It does a very nice job of illustrating           the purpose and effect of using flyback or catch diodes on           inductive loads like relay coils.
        
          
        Since the topic has arisen here a number of times, I           thought this might be of interest.
        
          
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6I7Ycbv8B8
        
          
        Eric
        
      [b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 11:23 am    Post subject: Flyback Diodes | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 08:19 2014-11-18, you wrote:
 
  So, the diode we find jumpered between the coil contacts on let's say, our starter relay, prevents a high voltage shooting back thru our starter switch and arcing the contacts when we let go of the starter key/switch?
 
      Yes . . .
 
  Or does it prevent a power surge from hitting the entire electrical system?
 
      Not at all. Contactor/relay coil flyback, catch or    suppression diodes have been part-and-parcel of the    system designer's toolbox for quite a few years. While    I was a tech writer at Cessna (65-69), our chief scientist,    Gordon Wood, Phd, purchased this nifty peak-reading    voltmeter (Hewlett-Packard I think) and did some    battery and starter contactor behavior studies in the    labs.
  
      "My gawd Mabel . . . did you see the size of that    spike?!?!?! Gee whiz . . . over 400 volts . . .     that sounds dangerous."
  
      This was exactly the time when Aircraft Radio    Corporation, recently purchased by Cessna, was    producing Cessna branded 300, 500 and ultimately    400 Series radios and autopilots.
  
      When the radios began to show up with transistorized    audio/modulator and dc/dc converters for vacuum    tube high voltage, we began to experience a rash of    un-explained failures in the transistors of newly    installed radios. We were building 10,000 airplanes    a year back then . . . needless to say, even a few    percent failure rate in radios was a SIGNIFICANT impact    to corporate bottom line.
  
      The quest was on . . . if not to understand what    was really happening . . . then at least to stop    the failures. About that same time, Cessna hired    Wichita University to craft a course on "The    Industrial use of Transistors," which was well    attended by about 20 folks from both Cessna plants    and your's truly.
  
      The instructor was extremely well versed in the topic    being that he was both a college prof and a sought    after consultant. Not a great teacher . . . but    Jerry Wedel I learned how to 'pick his brain'    in useful ways by the questions we asked. We sat    on opposite sides of the class and stroked him    to our great advantage.
  
      Back then, the power transistors of choice were    germanium, mostly PNP devices with max operating    voltages on the order of 30 volts. Hmmmm . . .
  
      Mean while, back at the airplane farm, Gordon was    poking around the electrical systems of our airplanes    in search of clues. It was quickly discovered that    adding the diode across the contactor coil    completely eliminated the gawd-awful spike. Whew!    Slew that dragon. But that still didn't fix the    radio failures. About then, flight test pilots    discovered that if the radios were OFF during engine    start, the did not suffer the failures. 
  
      You know what came next. The avionics master switch    was born. Simultaneously, a new line of thought was    launched into the aviation consciousness . . . and    a new phrase was oft repeated on avionics benches    across the world, "Damn, I think a spike got it."
  
 
      It took about two decades before anyone really    began to sift the simple-ideas for properties of    materials and management of energy (it's called    engineering) and figure out what was really    going on.  Turns out that transistor failures in    the radios were not suffering the effects of high    voltage spikes . . . but second breakdown effects    in relatively fragile transistors due to LOW voltage    effects, i.e. brownout during cranking. 
  
      Batteries back then were pretty sorry things by    today's standards. Our 'airplane patch' east of    the plant would have hundreds of new airplanes    parked out there awaiting ferry pilots. The     batteries were NEVER attended to in a manner    consistent with their physics . . . hence, more    that a few airplanes needed to be propped, jumped    and/or battery charged . . . but only AFTER    the pilot had attempted to start the airplane    perhaps with one or more radios turned ON.
  
      It was also not well understood that those    spectacular contactor coil spikes never went    anywhere . . . at least not out onto the ship's    electrical system. 99% of energy stored on    the contactor's inductance was dissipated in    the air-gap of the spreading switch contacts    as the battery master was turned OFF or the    starter switch was released.
  
      The diodes across the coil were a good thing,    it saved wear and tear on switches . . . but    had no significance on the life span of a radio    or any other appliance.
  
      In still later years, there was some earnest    debate about OTHER effects of adding diodes    across relay or contactor coils. Simple     measurements demonstrated that adding the    diode caused there to be a DELAY in relay/    contactor drop-out . . . the diode cause    coil current to be sustained for some milliseconds    after the switch opened as energy stored in    the coil was dissipated in circuit resistance.
  
      Hmmm . . . if the contactior's release    is delayed/slowed, does that also translate    into a slower contact spreading velocity    which in turn aggravates the arcing? Intuitively    it seems likely . . . indeed, many articles    have been written, some by folks working for    big-name companies that thoroughly described    the diode induced drop-out DELAY . . . and    then extrapolated that good information into    an erroneous assumption that influences    on drop-out delay were equally applicable    to contact spreading velocity . . . without    making a single measurement.
  
      On page 4 of this document
  
 
    http://tinyurl.com/n296nl6
 
      there are 'scope displays that demonstrate    approx 5x increase in dropout delay for    having added a plain-vanilla diode across    a relay coil.
  
      At the same time, the contact spreading    times are very similar demonstrating no    significant difference in the arc     signature.
 
  Bill "waking up brain cells in disuse since early adolescence" Watson
  (nice video, thanks!)
 
      The youtube tutorial was nicely done and    confirms the value of adding SOME form of    coil spike suppression . . . but to extrapolate    the demonstration's significance for other    features of relay performance is fraught    with opportunity for error.
 
 
     Bob . . .     [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |