Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Sea/Float Plane empty vs. gross weight considerations

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Seaplane-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
av8rps(at)tznet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:27 pm    Post subject: Sea/Float Plane empty vs. gross weight considerations Reply with quote

Chris,

It was nice meeting you at Oshkosh. I enjoyed the short time we had to
talk. I like any Super Cub as they make nice seaplanes generally.

In reference to my comment about the airplane being able to carry it's own
weight, I was just using that example to say airplanes with that capability
will most likely make the best choices as seaplanes. Particularly as an
amphibious seaplane because the additional weight of the landing gear in the
floats makes such a difference in performance and payload.

So to clarify my comment further, any airplane that can lift it's own EMPTY
WEIGHT (measured while it is on wheels) will most likely make a good
seaplane. Of course this is assuming the designer has tested the gross
weight limits, not just pulled a number out of a hat (which does happen,
believe it or not).

So using my model IV Kitfox with a 912 as an example; It weighs 627 pounds
on wheels, and has a tested gross weight of 1200 pounds. That means my 627
pound airplane can lift 573 pounds of weight off the ground, or 91% of it's
empty weight.

Using another example; If a new Kitox Super Sport with a 912uls (100 hp)
has an average 775 pound empty weight (again on wheels), and a tested 1550
pound gross weight, it has a 775 pound useful load, or the capacity to carry
aloft 100% of it's own empty weight. Once again, the new Kitfox would make
an excellent choice for a seaplane.

As a last example; An early Avid Flyer that has a 396 pound empty weight,
but a 911 pound tested gross weight, it has a 515 pound useful load, or is
carrying 130% of its empty weight. So early Avid Flyers make excellent
seaplanes for sure (see attached brochure specs for an early Avid. BTW -
the airplane in the picture on floats weighed 360 pounds on wheels, and flew
two adults off the water just great....on 40 hp! I know this factually as I
still have the airplane....)

Obviously one has to look hard at the mission you want your seaplane to do.
But these numbers should help the group here to understand better what
exactly I was trying to say with that statement I made to you.

Paul Seehafer
---


- The Matronics Seaplane-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Seaplane-List



3rd_Brochure_Cover_centerfold_at_85_percent.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  315.8 KB
 Viewed:  571 Time(s)

3rd_Brochure_Cover_centerfold_at_85_percent.JPG


Back to top
Malcolmbru(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:22 pm    Post subject: Sea/Float Plane empty vs. gross weight considerations Reply with quote

has anybody herd fromm the guy wanting to build his own 1,900 grose flots? mal

Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Seaplane-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Seaplane-List
Back to top
Chris In Marshfield



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:56 am    Post subject: Re: Sea/Float Plane empty vs. gross weight considerations Reply with quote

Hi Paul,

Thanks for taking the time to clarify your comments. Much appreciated. Very helpful information when choosing a design.

It was great meeting you as well. Hopefully we'll have more time to chat one day. Any other Wisconsin seaplane fly-ins that are worthy of attendance? Perhaps I'll see you at one of them.

Best regards,
Chris


- The Matronics Seaplane-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Seaplane-List

_________________
Chris Owens
Waunakee, WI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Seaplane-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group